The type std::pair<Point<float>, float> inherits from an empty base on
C++17. Due to a bug in GCC 10.1 this would prevent the compiler from
treating it as a HFA type, and it would use a different register to pass
it, than it does in newer GCC versions. Because of this ABI change an
ABI warning is emitted by GCC today, hinting at this fact.
By using a custom struct that does not inherit from an empty base we are
avoiding emitting this warning.
We now require a mouse movement before highlighting menu items. This is
intended to ensure that the user has intentionally highlighted the menu
item that they wish to trigger.
This makes behaviour more consistent between the parented and
non-parented display modes.
Before this change, parented popup menus wouldn't respond to mouse
clicks until the mouse was released once, which meant that clicking and
dragging the mouse over a menu wouldn't trigger a menu item on mouse-up.
Before this change, when starting a mouse drag from a nested view such
as a webview, JUCE was unable to automatically determine which component
is associated with the drag.
Instead of relying on automatic detection, users can pass the
"sourceComponent" argument when initiating a drag to specify the parent
view that should receive associated drag events. However, previously the
sourceComponent was only used to find the view associated with the
mouse-down, but not the mouse-up. Automatic detection was always used
for the mouse-up, but this could fail in the case of a drag started from
a nested view.
Now, the drag event source will store a weak reference to the source
component provided by the user, and use the same component for both
mouse-down and mouse-up events.
Previously, the vblank's thread loop would block on each iteration until
the current async callback had finished, at which point a new async
callback would be immediately triggered.
The new implementation only waits on the vblank event. If a vblank
callback is still in progress the next time the vblank event is
signalled, we assume the last frame is overrunning and avoid sending a
new async update.
The intention of this change is to avoid saturating the message thread
with expensive vblank callbacks. It's also nice to remove a lock,
although that's just an incidental change.
When two monitors are available, both with different scale factors, then
the drag-image may 'detach' from the mouse while the image's top-left
coordinate was on one display, and the mouse cursor was on the other
display.
This happened because, on Windows, the mouse cursor moves continuously
in physical (not logical!) space. In other words, the mouse may not move
continuously in logical space, and the discontinuity becomes visible
when components are positioned relative to the mouse in logical space.
In order to display consistently, the top-left position of the image
must be set relative to the physical position of the mouse.
This bug could be observed by running the WidgetsDemo Drag+Drop pane on
Windows 10, and dragging an item between two displays at different scale
factors.
This is issue is a regression introduced in
9817a2bb66. The regression was caused by
the change in mouse position calculation. The incorrect version switched
to using ClientToScreen, but the correct version used
getPointFromLocalLParam.
The function getPointFromLocalLParam was replaced by clientLParamToPoint
in 24ab3cb6a3, and is restored by this
commit.
This change intends to address a bug observed only on Windows 10 with a
display scale factor of 125%.
When the native titlebar is enabled, and the window's border-resizer is
used to resize the window slowly the with mouse, the client area of the
window may move to the wrong location, or be drawn with some areas
obscured/clipped. This is especially observable when resizing the
WidgetsDemo to its smallest size, and then dragging the right border a
single pixel to the right. On my computer, this consistently causes the
client area to display at the wrong location.
I haven't been able to find any obvious bug in JUCE that might cause
this behaviour. In particular, it seems that the window begins
displaying incorrectly *before* the window ever actually resizes.
During the resize, the system sends events (WM_SIZING and
WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING) to the window, and according to the documentation,
the window may modify the message parameters in order to constrain the
new window size. When running on a scaled display, JUCE attempts to map
the logical client area size to a sensible size in physical pixels, and
uses the sizing messages to enforce this size requirement.
In the case of the broken window rendering, the system requests a new
window size, which JUCE rejects. The window's display state doesn't
change, so the swap chain does not resize, and the swap chain does not
present. Put another way, the broken rendering happens *independently*
of JUCE modifying the swap chain in any way. Therefore, I believe that the
bug is introduced elsewhere, potentially by Windows itself.
I also checked to see whether the issue could be caused by mishandling
of the NCCALCSIZE message, which is normally used to configure the
relative positions of the client and nonclient areas. However, in the
buggy case, NCCALCSIZE is not sent until *after* the first 'broken'
frame is painted - and even then, the implementation immediately falls
back to DefWindowProc.
Given that the issue appears to be a bug in Windows, the proposed change
is a workaround, rather than a true fix. It appears as though the
problem goes away when WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING does not modify the
requested bounds. Therefore, for windows with native titlebars, we rely
on the constraints to be applied in WM_SIZING only, when sizing the
window in a sizemove gesture.
Previously, for windows with a native titlebar and a constrainer, the
window could be restored at the wrong size. This happened because
findPhysicalBorderSize() may return nonsensical values when called
during a SC_RESTORE, which in turn produces an unexpected window size
when adding the bogus border size to the constrained client area size.
We now avoid trying to constrain the window if we're unable to determine
the correct border size. I think this is only likely to happen during
SC_RESTORE, in which case the system should have a pretty good idea of
where the window should go, and constraining should not be necessary.
The buggy behaviour could be seen in a blank GUI app project by setting
a native titlebar and calling setResizable (false, false). The resulting
window would still display a resize cursor when hovering the window
border.
Previously, the set Comparator behaved the same way, regardless of the
value of columnFirst. This is incorrect; the set should be sorted such
that the final item in the set has the greatest cross-dimension.
There was also an off-by-one error in the result of
getHighestCrossDimension(). The highestCrossDimension data member is
exclusive, but the cell values in the occupiedCells set are inclusive.
We need to add 1 to the maximum cell cross-dimension in order to convert
it to an exclusive value.
